Lighthouse has a new layout. Prefer the old one? Return to the old layout, and switch back any time from the link at the top of each page.

OFX direct connect

#12

Our big competitors can connect directly to financial institutions using the ofx protocol. It's called direct connect and it seems to be implemented mostly in US banks.

This seems to be something that Intuit (Quicken) holds on to. They have agreements with the financial institutions and a certification program. However, iBank does support direct connect. I don't believe that they pay Intuit anything to do that. They probably just support the banks that don't put a restriction on who can connect to their ofx servers.

The official ofx page (http://www.ofx.net) does not give any help on how to implement direct connect, but the community-driven http://www.ofxhome.com does maintain a list of ofx servers.

The problem is that I don't have an account in a bank that supports direct connect. I don't think that my bank supports it, so it's hard to test it.

Reported by Virgil Dupras · June 4th, 2009 @ 04:25 PM

State: hold
Milestone: none
Assigned to: nobody

Activity

  1. Virgil Dupras
    Virgil Dupras
    • Tag changed from suggestion to from-trac, suggestion

    [tagged:"from-trac" bulk edit command]

    June 4th, 2009 @ 04:49 PM

  2. Randy Becker
    Randy Becker

    I really like moneyGuru's focus on making hand-entry efficient. I've been looking at a lot of personal finance software lately, and many of them are focused on downloading data directly from banks, to the exclusion of making it easy (or possible) to enter data manually. This is a bug, not a feature.

    Direct downloading strongly encourages users to trust their banks, and merchants. If users just wanted to know what their currently cleared balance is, they could check their banks' websites. One big reason I use personal finance software is to keep banks and merchants honest. By manually entering my transactions, and then checking them against the bank, I know that no one has made an error. I know not only what transactions have cleared, but what transaction have not cleared. The more certain I am about the expected future balance of my checking account, for example, the more money I can safely keep in a savings account, earning interest. Direct downloading might appear to save users time, but it encourages behavior that can cost them money.

    Additionally, there are many technical issues with direct downloading. Many banks don't want to pay Quicken's fees, and so some "competitors" screen-scrape bank websites to get the data. OFX is much more complicated that QIF. Downloaded transactions need to be de-duplicated with manually entered ones using smart importing rules, as banks do silly things like putting payee names in all caps. New UI would be needed, and you would need to create and maintain a list of institutions that support downloading, and by what means, although it looks like OFX home has a list, which explains why iBank has three separate progress bars for downloading lists of OFX-compliant banks.

    August 16th, 2009 @ 08:05 PM

  3. Virgil Dupras
    Virgil Dupras
    • Tag changed from from-trac, suggestion to feature, from-trac

    [not-tagged:"suggestion" tagged:"feature" bulk edit command]

    September 5th, 2009 @ 07:10 PM

  4. Virgil Dupras
    Virgil Dupras
    • State changed from new to hold

    January 14th, 2010 @ 01:53 PM

  5. Virgil Dupras
    Virgil Dupras
    • Tag changed from feature, from-trac to feature
    • Milestone order changed from 0 to 0

    June 7th, 2011 @ 02:17 PM

Please Sign in or create a free account to add a new ticket.

With your very own profile, you can contribute to projects, track your activity, watch tickets, receive and update tickets through your email and much more.